Monday, April 2, 2018

Do the Patterns of Your Life Predict Your Future?

On the radio this morning I heard an interesting story that relates to our discussion about free will and determinism last week.


The story discussed the research of sociologists (particularly, Matthew Salganik from Princeton University) trying to use computer models to predict the path of people's lives.  As computer algorithms have gotten to be more powerful, they've become better and better at understanding patterns and predicting the future.  Pandora can guess which songs you might like; Netflix recommends movies and shows for you personally, based on your previous history.  So can we predict what path a person's life might take, using the patterns from their past?

The story describes the project: 

"So Salganik set to work. He got a massive trove of data on 5,000 kids who had been followed from the day they were born, then made that information available to data geeks and researchers across the globe. Four hundred teams were given incredibly detailed information about the kids from birth until age nine, then told to predict their grades — and a handful of other outcomes — at age 15."

What did Salganik find?  In fact, the predictions were all very inaccurate.  No one was able to create a model that could reliably predict where the person would end up based on the data they had been given.

Duncan Watts, a sociology researcher who works at Microsoft Research, explains:

"We find exactly the same pattern everywhere we look... when you're talking about individual outcomes, there's a lot of randomness," Watts says.
"And the other half of this conversation is that people don't like that answer, and so they keep wanting a different answer. They say nature abhors a vacuum. Humans abhor randomness. We like deterministic stories," Duncan says. 

We like the idea that patterns can tell us what will happen in life because that idea makes us feel more secure, he says.

"If you think you can predict things— even if you're wrong — it means that you get up in the morning and you feel confident," Watts says. "And so you can invest your time and energy today in things that won't pay off until tomorrow."
We want to be able to predict what will happen, to feel like we have some kind of control over our lives or over our children’s lives.  But maybe there just is a lot of randomness in life and how things turn out, and we have to come to terms with that.
What should we think about this research?  What does it tell us about human life and the problem of free will?

One possibility is that the lack of deterministic patterns is evidence that humans have free will.  Of course human behavior looks random--that's because each person is a free agent and makes her own choice.

But maybe that's not it.  Maybe where we end up going is random because the situations that people face are so random.  The bank robber in the story because a law professor because of random things that happened to him, not because of something he clearly chose.

Another possibility is that human behavior really is determined by external factors and patterns, but we just haven't learned what they are yet.  Presumably there are things that determine, say, the weather, but they are so complex and hard to measure that we haven't yet been able to model and predict weather perfectly... yet!  But that's no reason to think we never will be able to predict weather, or predict human behavior, if we have more data and better models.

4 comments:

  1. I agree with the statement that one of the possibilities is that "the lack of deterministic patterns is evidence that humans have free will." This definitely demonstrates that humans do indeed have free will because of the fact that we cannot determine what they will do. Human beings are so diverse in the way they are raised, born genetically, and all the experiences they go through that there is simply no way to determine what someone will do. Someone could be feeling happy on a certain day and make one decision, and then given that same decision to make when they are feeling sad they could make another decision. Free will is the only answer when it comes to the decisions we make.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't agree with Blake's statement that because there is a lack of deterministic patterns that this means that there is a free will. A free will is not a necessary prerequisite for the randomness that is displayed in the many different lives used in this study. For starters, it's likely that we simply don't understand enough about the human psyche to attempt to predict the decisions and outcomes of different people’s lives. It's a possibility that with a better understanding we as humans could accurately predict the lives of different people. There are also too many unknown variables to make an accurate conclusion on why the models failed. It could have simply been that the researchers weren’t using the right information or were putting too much emphasis on the wrong factors in their model. Another thing to note is that this was only one trial and error of what is likely to be many more trial and errors to come. It’s not realistic to think that the first few times this study is done that it will be solved. In fact, it will likely take hundreds of trials before someone even comes remotely close to creating a model that can predict the outcomes of other’s lives, if such a thing can be created. In the history of science, groundbreaking discoveries and breakthroughs such as this one took many years and many scientists. Another thing to consider is that the technology we are using in today’s day and age might not be up to par with what they are attempting to do. Perhaps in the future an advanced AI or advanced technology could lead to this breakthrough. 100 years ago scientists would have thought it inconceivable to do some of the things we are able to do know with the many technological breakthroughs over the years. A final thing I want to point out is that it may not necessarily be that people having a free will makes it impossible to predict the outcomes of their lives; it may be the utter randomness of the world as a whole. It’s impossible for the researchers to know exactly every external factor that will affect the individuals; randomness should not be mistaken for free will. In short, I wanted to point out that we can’t rush to the conclusion that we have a free will because of the failure of these researchers. There are simply to many unknowns to make any sort of conclusive decision.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with Blake's comment. Yes, David makes a good point about how there are several other factors that need to be calculated into the equation; however, I think that the sole reason is placed on free will. I find it absolutely impossible for them to ever be able to predict an individual's future because our lives are so complex and constantly changing from the time we are born to the present day. I personally am not the same person as I was 10 years ago. I've matured and learned how to handle situations other ways than I used to. It is simply not possible for technology to be able to identify exactly how someone is going to react to given situations; these situations will never be able to be predicted either. Life is full of unpredictable events that we as humans have the free will to respond in whatever way we feel like. One day we could react positively and the next day we could have a completely different reaction to the exact same problem. Humans are simply too complex.

    ReplyDelete